On 19 December 2025, the Swiss Federal Parliament adopted the Investment Screening Act, introducing a new foreign direct investment (FDI) control regime focusing on security‑critical sectors and state‑controlled investors. This newsflash highlights the key points of the new regime for businesses, dealmakers, and investors.
I. Overall Policy Approach
The newly adopted Swiss Investment Screening Act (the "ISA") is intended to protect Switzerland's public order and security, while maintaining Switzerland’s general openness to foreign investments. The Swiss approach is deliberately narrow compared to the FDI regimes of most other OECD jurisdictions: only acquisitions of control by foreign state-controlled investors in security-critical sectors are subject to clearance. Private foreign investors remain outside the scope of the ISA. The new ISA will not replace pre-existing sector-specific change of control regimes or FDI regulations (e.g., regarding residential real estate or the banking and insurance industry). These sector-specific regulations will continue to apply in addition to the ISA.
II. Which Transactions Are Subject to Clearance?
Acquisitions of Swiss businesses active in specified critical sectors of the Swiss economy by state-controlled foreign investors are notifiable and subject to clearance prior to implementation.
State-controlled investors as sole addressees
The central feature of the ISA is that it only applies to foreign state-controlled investors. These include foreign state administrations and agencies, companies headquartered outside Switzerland under direct or indirect control of a foreign state, asset-holding entities under direct or indirect control of a foreign state, and individuals or entities acting on behalf of a foreign state.
By contrast, private foreign investors are not covered. While this limitation reflects a policy intended to maintain the openness of Switzerland to foreign investments, it can still raise interpretative questions in practice: for example, state-controlled investors sponsoring or anchoring private equity funds or joint ventures involving governmental entities may require close review.
As in other FDI regimes of OECD countries, the Federal Council may exempt investors from states where sufficient cooperation exists to avert security risks.
Target companies
The ISA applies to businesses registered in the Swiss commercial register, regardless of their legal form, organization, or the location of their assets. The concept of "Swiss business" includes Swiss subsidiaries of foreign groups.
Transaction types
The ISA adopts the competition law concept of "acquisition of control." It covers mergers, share acquisitions, and contractual arrangements establishing control. Accordingly, low-governance minority stakes without control rights will generally fall outside the scope of the ISA. Reliance on "control" makes governance rights and vetoes under shareholders' agreements potentially critical for the determination of whether a transaction is notifiable.
III. Which Sectors Are Covered?
The ISA specifies the covered security-critical sectors and establishes quantitative thresholds to determine which acquisitions are screened:
Highly sensitive sectors (threshold: 50 FTEs or CHF 10 million annual turnover):
Other critical sectors (threshold: CHF 100 million annual turnover):
The Federal Council may subject additional categories of businesses to screening and clearance for up to 12 months (renewable once) if necessary to guarantee public order and security.
IV. Substantive Review
The ISA provides that the transaction will be cleared unless it threatens Swiss public order or security.
The ISA lists indicative factors that will be considered in the assessment:
Clearance may be conditional.
The open-ended formulation of the substantive review is consistent with international standards and seeks to give authorities significant discretion.
V. Procedure
Jurisdiction and procedure
The State Secretariat for Economic Affairs ("SECO") conducts the review process in consultation with other federal administrative agencies and after hearing the Federal Intelligence Service.
The procedure adheres to a two-phase model:
Deadlines may be extended under certain circumstances. If no decision is issued within the applicable deadline, clearance is deemed to be granted.
Standstill obligation
Transactions subject to clearance may not be completed until cleared. Civil law effectiveness is suspended until then. Accordingly, parties should account for potential FDI review delays when planning the transaction closing.
Advance ruling
Target businesses may request a binding advance ruling from SECO on whether a transaction is notifiable (decision within two months, valid for 12 months, renewable once).
Legal remedies
Investors and the target business (but not competitors or other third parties) have standing to appeal SECO or Federal Council decisions to the Federal Administrative Court.
VI. Ex Officio Proceedings and Sanctions
SECO may initiate proceedings ex officio if non-compliance with notification requirements is suspected.
Completing a transaction without any required clearance, obtaining clearance on the basis of false information, or violating conditions may result in sanctions of up to 10% of the worldwide turnover of the target business. The Federal Council may order remedial measures, including divestment.
Violations of information duties may be sanctioned with fines up to CHF 100,000.
VII. Entry into Force and Outlook – What Should Businesses Do Now?
The ISA is realistically expected to enter into force no earlier than 2027, following the adoption of implementing regulations.
Due to its narrow scope, the impact of the ISA should be limited in practice. Significantly fewer transactions are expected to be covered by the ISA than by other European regimes or CFIUS. Nevertheless, deal complexity may increase for a cohort of transactions. For example, sovereign wealth funds have become a very active class of investors worldwide.
For businesses, dealmakers, and investors, key takeaways are: